Coastal Commission Bills Squashed
REAL ESTATE LEGISLATION
September 18th, 2009
The California Coastal Commission had two bills pending that would have greatly expanded their powers over development including projects far from the coastal environment. The California Association of Realtors (CAR) have fought these bills and won, for now.
AB 226 proposed to expand the Coastal Commission’s authority to levy its own civil penalties instead of pursuing fines and penalties through courts. This bill, according to our lobbyists, “would give the Commission the power to be judge, jury and executioner” avoiding the due process allowed by existing laws. The bill failed passage in this first year of a two-year legislative session.
AB 291 would have allowed the Coastal Commission to halt permit application processing for “violations that have no relationship between the application and the existing violation on the parcel in question”. Both bills have been placed by their authors in the “inactive file” but can be revived next year.
Other bills which CAR opposed include:
- AB 827-a bill that would have allowed county recorders to charge a $3 per property-related document to fund archival services. What this bill really does is open the door for bill sponsors to circumvent local voters by calling this a fee instead of what it really is-a new tax. Without opposition, this could develop into a trend to tax property-related services to secure funding for a wide range of local government expenditures.
- SB 407-a point-of-sale mandate that would have required sellers retrofit their property with low-flush toilets, shower heads and faucets. The bill was amended dropping the point-of-sale mandate. CAR removed its opposition and the bill passed and now sits on the governor’s desk awaiting signature. The bill now would apply to all properties in California-requiring water saving retrofits by 2017.
- AB 758-another point-of-sale mandate requiring energy audits of all property being sold. The bill was amended “ensuring home energy audits or improvements will not adversely affect real property transactions and offers programs for cost-effective energy efficiency improvements for existing buildings”.
- SB 183-Yet another point-of-sale retrofit bill requiring installation of carbon monoxide detectors. The bill has been amended eliminating the point-of-sale requirement, delaying the deadline for implementation and adding language to the Transfer Disclosure statement regarding these safety devices. A final vote on this bill will take place when legislators reconvene in January.
Nearly a decade ago the Coastal Commission pushed a ballot initiative that in part required the state to adopt statewide septic regulations. Those regulations met stiff opposition during public forums held across the state in recent months. The regulations are under review and time will tell what the final regulations will require.
Realtors are now focused on lobbying for the continuation and expansionof the federal Homebuyer Tax Credit which is scheduled to expire at the end of November.
530-224-6767 or 530-941-7492
BRAD GARBUTT
REALTOR/BROKER ASSOCIATE
REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS GMAC
CORNER OF COURT AND PLACER IN REDDING
QUARTER CENTURY LOCAL REAL ESTATE EXPERIENCE
Mr. Garbutt, the Coastal Commission’s jurisdictional area would not be changed by either bill. Your statement that AB291 and 226 would, “have greatly expanded their powers over development including projects far from the coastal environment” is incorrect. It’s a shame that the CA real estate industry doesn’t understand the importance of the coastal protection and preservation that the Coastal Commission provides.
Great read. This is my 1st visit to your blog. Thanks for sharing . I have to bookmark this blog. I am a room decor specialist for 5 years. Our decor tip of the century is: Do not overcrowd a home. A good walking path is a plus. Thank you one more time….
After research a couple of of the weblog posts in your web site now, and I actually like your approach of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site list and will likely be checking again soon. Pls try my web page as well and let me know what you think.
Aw, this was a very nice post. In idea I wish to put in writing like this additionally – taking time and precise effort to make an excellent article… however what can I say… I procrastinate alot and in no way appear to get something done.
It has been interesting but how should i bookmark this?
This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.