Brad Garbutt

REALTORĀ®, Associate Broker

Since 1983, I have helped thousands of families and individuals buy and sell homes in Redding/Shasta County. The only thing that exceeds my experience is my commitment to you because whether you're buying or selling a home, your satisfaction is my number one goal. My commitment to you includes implementing the latest real estate technology and resources to effectively market and sell your property. When you're ready to buy or sell a home and you want exceptional service, call me!

Read More

Local Resources


Real Estate News


Blogroll


Recent Posts


My Neighborhood Schools

Get your own Local Schools Widget


CALIFORNIA REALTORS OPPOSE COSTLY POINT-OF-SALE MANDATE

INDUSTRY NEWS, REAL ESTATE LEGISLATION, REAL ESTATE PRACTICE, SHASTA COUNTY, TIPS FOR BUYERS, TIPS FOR SELLERS, TIPS FOR SENIORS
August 6th, 2008

Assembly Bill 2204 (De La Torre) would require county lawyers to review every deed and other title documents including C,C,&R’s, and remove illegal, obsolete and unenforceable restrictions from title records before a property could be transferred. This review process would be costly and time consuming and county recorders would have to charge a huge fee to pay for this legal work. The California Association of Realtors (C.A.R.) estimates AB 2204 would tack on $500-$1000 in additional recording fees that would be passed on to the buyer. C.A.R opposes this bill for the following reasons:

  1. Current law already protects buyers and renters from discrimination. Existing mechanisms already deal with this issue effectively.
  2. Home buyers face the burden of paying the additional cost to implement this law when they can least afford it.
  3. Counties will be forced to hire additional lawyers to handle the massive workload this bill creates. L.A. County estimates they will need at least 27 new lawyers to examine 17,000 transactions monthly. Most transactions have multiple documents such as deeds and C,C&R’s in a chain of title that must be reviewed.
  4. History is erased by“sanitizing” these records instead of leaving them in place as a reminder of mistakes made by society in the past.
  5. No legal benefit will be derived from altering the permanent record but could divert the buyers attention away from a lengthy list of critical disclosures. This distraction is an additional burden to the buyer.

Existing law already invalidates any provision in a deed to real property that restricts the right of a person to sell,lease,rent,use, or occupy a property based on race, color, religion, sex, marital status, national orgin, ancestry, familial status, disability, source of income, or sexual orientation.

Historically, C.A.R opposes point-of-sale mandates because they unfairly punish individuals that choose to sell a property instead of making all property owners abide by the legislative mandate. Please call me if you have questions on this bill or any real estate matter. My contact information follows:

www.movetoredding.com

www.BRADGARBUTT.com

bradgreps@yahoo.com

530-224-6767 or 530-941-7492

BRAD GARBUTT

REALTOR/BROKER

REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS GMAC

TWENTY FIVE YEARS REAL ESTATE EXPERIENCE

  1. Esther Auerbach

    Thanks for bringing such an important issue to the forefront, Brad. The staggering cost of “re-writing” history would obviously be borne by the consumers, and have a detrimental impact on our already beleaguered Real Estate Industry.

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2008 Brad Garbutt All rights Reserved
The material on this site may not be reproduced or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of REPGMAC
Design by Real Estate Tomato     Powered by Tomato Blogs   Agent Login